Management is the ability to create, organize and use resources economically, efficiently and effectively. Management is an essential aspect of human life, both personal and collective. Personal management shapes effective individuals, while collective management is necessary for well-being. well-functioning institutions. Management is good or bad. Poor management plays a crucial role in institutional failure or inefficiency.
Educational institutions impart knowledge, build character, and improve student knowledge. They prepare the students for practical life. An inefficient-ineffective educational institution will produce harmful individuals for society. There are several reasons for the inefficiency or ineffectiveness of an educational institution, such as: B. Teacher mediocrity, curriculum irrelevance, ineffective leadership and poor management system.
Poor management, however, is a key disadvantage of underperforming educational institutions. Poor management means: traditional management techniques by educational entrepreneurs, imitative leadership approach by academics, micro-management style by the principal/principal, investor mentality by the owners, and dictatorial approach to classroom management by teachers. There are three main areas of the quality learning process: the key activity area, the performance area, and the relationship area. First of all, the key activities revolve around the uptake/dissemination of knowledge.
Key activities typically include learning objectives, course planning, learning curriculum, teaching methods, and classroom management. Second, the performance area focuses on learning outcomes. It examines student learning performance, teacher teaching performance and performance management. class teacher/principal. Third, relationship analysis looks at multiple relationships among students, teachers, parents, and education managers.
First and foremost it is about the effective administration of all learning events. The ultimate goal of relationship analysis is to obtain synergistic results from the learning process. Quality management versus micromanagement Governance is an inevitable aspect of collective life. It can take two paths: good and bad.
Good corporate governance is based on quality management, while bad corporate governance is the result of micromanagement. Mainly, quality management is a system that relentlessly strives for excellence to improve the services offered, while micro-management takes a cosmetic approach to improvement. Quality management differs from micromanagement in myriad dimensions, but the most notable differences are: Quality management is modern management, while micromanagement is traditional management. Traditional management is very hierarchical, organized and disciplined.
It’s the military leadership style, so it only works in the military or in a microstructure. On the other hand, quality management is democratic management; it is against the dominant tactics of individuals. A quality manager derives his authority from the principles he follows, while the micromanager derives his authority from the position he holds. Quality management uses the talent of people at all levels (learning, teaching and management). ) optimally, while Micro Management
focuses only on the leader’s talents, forgetting everyone’s talents or the collective talent based on healthy competition or cooperation.